Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:01

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
‘Uber for Getting Off Antidepressants’ Launches in the US - WIRED
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What's next for the video game industry as Nintendo launches the long-awaited Switch 2 - NPR
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
According to Trump, Ukraine started the war. Why?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How corporate America learnt not to mess with Texas - Financial Times
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
12 Tips For The Alters You Need To Know Before You Play - GameSpot
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Nvidia, Other Chip Stocks Slide Amid Worries About US-China Trade Tensions - Investopedia
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What are some cute stories with your crush?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.